"The Aesthetics of Film Music"

Introduction

What is it, exactly, that music contributes to a fihn? David Raksin has written that music's avowed purpose in films is "to help realize the meaning of a film." Aaron Copland has said that a composer can do no more than "make potent through music the film's dramatic and emotional value." Both observations approach a general answer to the question. We shall divide this question further into five rather broad areas, taking a detailed look at each. The main headings are Aaron Copland's, drawn from his article in The New York Times of November 6, 1949; the discussion that follows each heading is the author's work.







"Music can create a more convincing atmosphere of time and place."



There are a variety of ways of achieving an atmosphere of time and place, or, musically speaking, "color." In a broad sense, musical color may be taken to represent the exotic or sensuous aspects of music, as distinct from musical structure, or line, which might be considered the intellectual side. Although admittedly an oversimplification, this distinction has a good deal of validity in terms of film music. Film music is overwhelmingly coloristic in its intention and effect. This is always true when a composer is attempting to create an atmosphere of time and place.

Color is associative--bagpipes call up images of Scotland, the oboe easily suggests a pastoral scene, muted brass connotes something sinister, rock music may imply a youthful theme, and so on. Also, color is not intrusive; it does not compete with the dramatic action. This is especially important for film music. The effect of color, moreover, is immediate, unlike musical thematic development, which takes time. In addition, color is highly flexible and can be brought in and out with relative ease by the experienced screen composer. An important quality of color, given the short amount of time the composer usually has to write a feature score, is that color is easier to achieve than musical design. Finally, and probably most important of all, color can be readily understood by a musically unsophisticated film audience.

Musical color can be achieved in a variety of ways. One is to use musical material indigenous to the locale of a film. Thus Adolph Deutsch employed sea chanteys in Action on the North Atlantic, and Alfred Newman used street songs and hurdy-gurdy music in A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. A related technique is the use of musical devices that are popularly associated with foreign lands and people; for example, using the pentatonic idiom to achieve an Oriental color. The "Chinese" music written for a studio film of the 1930s and '40s is not, of course, authentic Chinese music but rather represents our popular Occidental notions of what Chinese music is like. The Western listener simply does not understand the symbols of authentic Oriental music as he does those of Western music; therefore, Oriental music would have little dramatic effect for him.

Along the same lines, there is the problem of stylistic integration. This arises when composers are required to use set pieces of music for purposes of color within the larger framework of their score. Such set pieces can include folk songs, music for fairs, street cries, dances, and so on. It is far better for the composer to arrange these pieces himself so that they conform stylistically with the rest of his music for the picture. The folksong arrangements of Bartók indicate ample precedent for this. The problem can be avoided entirely if the composer creates his own atmosphere music. An example of this is Bernard Herrmann's hurdy-gurdy music for Hangover Square. The film's climax includes the performance of a piano concerto written specially for the film and Herrmann simply took one of the concerto themes and transformed it into the hurdy-gurdy music.

Stylistic parody* is another coloristic device, and one that has been only slightly cultivated in film music. Examples can be found in Hugo Friedhofer's score to 7he Bishop's Wife, wherein he uses a concerto-grosso style, and in David Raksin's score to Forever Amber, in the pseudo-Handelian music for the amusing scene in the king's antechamber (a portion of this music can be seen in Figure 1). Few composers are capable of carrying off stylistic parody, for it takes an intimate sense of another's compositional style.

[*Parody, as used here, refers to the musical procedure common in the ltter part of the sixteenth century and exemplified in such works as Josquin's Mass Malheur me bat. The somewhat unfortunate term, of 19th-century German coinage, refers only to a method of composition and is not intended to have a pejorative meaning.]

This emphasis on color does not mean that musical line should or does go unused, however. The primary reason film composers have traditionally stayed away from complex line and structure in music is that such complicated structures cannot successfully be emphasized without competing with the dramatic action; i.e., it is bad film music. The answer to the problem of color and line, as it applies to film music, is that musical color can, to an extent, be created just as effectively by the confluence of individualized lines (a more contrapuntal texture) as by the arbitrary piling up of dissonance in a chord. Examples of this kind of contrapuntal coloristic writing abound in the scores of both David Raksin and Hugo Friedhofer. Raksin's score for the little-known film The Redeemer is full of canons and fugatos; Friedhofer's score to Joan of Arc has several highly contrapuntal sequences.







"Music can be used to underline or create psychological refinements--the unspoken thoughts of a character or the unseen implications of a situation."

Frequently, music can imply a psychological element far better than dialogue can. This use of film music is perhaps most effective when it is planned well in advance--when the film is in the scripting stage. Far too often, however, this possibility is passed over and music is not allowed to speak. Copland has observed that music"can play upon the emotions of the spectator, sometimes counterpointing the thing seen with an aural image that implies the contrary of the thing seen." Although music in film can be most effective in such instances, composers are given little chance to use it.

One of the classic examples of this kind of writing is found in David Raksin's score to Force of Evil discussed in some detail in chapter 3. In the final scene the main character, Joe (John Garfield), is seen running in the street, then along a great stone wall and down a huge flight of stairs. Yet the music here is not "running" music--Raksin has scored the emotional rather than the physical character of the scene. Joe has been running, figuratively, throughout the film; it is only now, as he begins the search for his dead brother's body, that he finds any sort of quietude. Raksin refleets this psychologieal point in his slow music for this sequence.

The ability of music to make a psychologieal point in film is a subtle one, and perhaps its most valuable contribution. Yet film theoreticians appear not even to recognize music's possibilities in this area. For example, George Bluestone, in his book Novels into Film, states that "the film, being a presentational medium (except for its use of dialogue) cannot have direct access to the power of discursive forms. The rendition of mental states--memory, dream, imagination--cannot be as adequately represented by film as by language. . . . The film, by arranging external signs for our visual perception, or by presenthig us with dialogue, can lead us to infer thought. But it cannot show us thought directly. It can show us characters thinking, feeling, and speaking, but it cannot show us their thoughts and feelings. A film is not thought; it is perceived."

This quote demonstrates the typical naïveté of most film theoreticians concerning the possibilities of music in films. If by the word "film" Bluestone means a total work (i.e., visuals, dialogue, sound effects, and music) then his statement is totally invalid, for music can and does serve just this function better than any other element of film.

Composer Leonard Rosenman has pointed out that ''film music has the power to change naturalism [in films] into reality. Actually, the musical contribution to the film should be ideally to create a supra-reality, a condition wherein the elements of literary naturalism are perceptually altered. In this way the audience can have the insight into different aspects of behavior and motivation not possible under the aegis of naturalism.

"Film music must thus enter directly into the 'plot' of the film, adding a third dimension to the images and words. It is an attempt to establish the supra-reality of a many-faceted portrayal of behvior that should motivate the composer in the selection of sequences to he scored and, just as important, the sequences to be left silent."

While music certainly does have the catalytic ability to change the audience's perception of images and words, it is worth pointing out that there is a corollary: the effect of the image and words upon the music. A simple recollection by composer Leonard Rosenman should suffice to make the point. Rosenman says,''There is a symbiotic catalytic exchange-relationship between the film and the music that accompanies it. I have personally had the experience of hearing musically unenlightened people comment positively and glowingly on a 'dissonant' score after seeing the film. I have played these same people records of the score without telling them that it came from the film they had previously seen. Their reaction ranged from luke-warm to positive rejection. . . ."







"Music can serve as a kind of neutral background filler."

Aaron Copland has said of "background" music: "This is really the kind of music one isn't supposed to hear, the sort that helps to fill the empty spots between pauses in a conversation. It's the movie composer's most ungrateful task. But at times, though no one else may notice, he will get private satisfaction from the thought that music of little intrinsic value, through professional manipulation, has enlivened and made more human the deathly pallor of a screen shadow. This is hardest to do . . . when the neutral filler type of music must weave its way underneath dialogue."

This can sometimes be the film composer's most difficult task for it calls for him to be at his most subordinative. At times one of the functions of film music is to do nothing more than be there, "as though it would exist as sound rather than as 'constructed' music." Even though it is filling a rather subordinate role to other elements in the picture, "filler" type music is in fact a very conscious dramatic device. Hugo Friedhofer's score to Broken Arrow offers two outstanding examples of how this can be masterfully handled.

The first example (Figure 2) is the underscoring for a scene at the beginning of the film. In this scene the film's star, James Stewart, is riding on horseback through the Western desert. Pictorially the setting is spacious, immobile, and quiet. The slow gait of the horse is the only sign of life; the hero is meditative, and a narrator starts the story on its way. Even though the inner parts are extremely simple, they still make music by themselves. There is just enough harmony in the outer parts to keep the solo clarinet from competing with the narrator's voice, and just enough mobility in the inner parts to counteract the rather static monotony of the double pedal.

The other example (Figure 3) of Friedhofer's from Broken Arrow is music accompanying a wedding ceremony. The tender, delicate melody, cast in the aeolian mode, is so well suited to its purpose that Lawrence Morton was moved to say that it "shows how it is possible to avoid the pitfall of an Apache Lohengrin."

There are times when music accompanying dialogue can take on a definite foreground character. An example of this is in the film The Heiress (see chapter 3). Generally, such music is treated musically in a recitative style reminiscent of the opera: blank spots in the dialogue are filled with fragments of music, which come to the foreground momentarily to comment on the dialogue and then drop back into the background when the next line is said. All of this has to be done, of course, by the way the composer writes his music, not by the simple turning of knobs in the dubbing room. Dimitri Tiomkin's score to High Noon has several prominent examples of this kind of writing, especially in the scenes involving the sheriflf and his deputy. Another example, again by David Raksin, and from the film Will Penny, clearly demonstrates how a composer writes around dialogue (see Figure 4).

In this example Raksin has treated the dialogue operatically, that is to say, in the manner of a recitative. The small "x's" above each staff of music indicate the "clicks" of the click track. Note that Raksin has written in the dialogue spoken by Preacher Quint exactly where it will occur in relation to the clicks. The dialogue begins in bar 7 with Preacher Quint's invocation, "Beware the wrath of the Lord." The music drops out when there is a line; this "clears" the dialogue without the dubber's having to drop the music level down when mixing it with the dialogue track. The time space between Quint's lines is filled with declamatory music. Note, too, Raksin's notation of the rhythm of the delivery of the lines "Life for life" and "eye for eye" in bars 11 and 12 (example 5).

The importance of this masterful attention to detail can be seen especially in bar 12 where the strings play a pizzicato figure, the third note of which (D- flat) fills the eighth rest in the dialogue.







"Music can help build a sense of continuity in a film."

Music can tie together a visual medium that is, by its very nature, continually in danger of falling apart. A film editor is probably most conscious of this particular attribute of music in films. In a montage, particularly, music can serve an almost indispensable function: it can hold the montage together with some sort of unifying musical idea. Without music the montage can, in some instances, become merely chaotic. Music can also develop this sense of continuity on the level of the film as a whole. This idea is discussed in greater detail in chapter 7.







"Music can provide the underpinning for the theatrical buildup of a scene and then round it off with a sense of finality."

Music has a way of bypassing the human's normal, rational defense mechanisms. When used properly, music can help build the drama in a scene to a far greater degree of intensity than any of the other cinematic arts. It is of little significance whether the scene involves an intimate love relationship or a violent fight; music evokes a gut reaction unobtainable in any other way. On the other hand, this can be one of the least effective uses of film music if not handled properly. In fact, many producers and directors seem to feel this is film music's only function in a film--especially if the film is inherently weak. Every composer who has worked in film has, at one time or another, been asked to provide music for a weak scene in the hopes that the music will somehow make the scene stronger. It simply cannot be done, and it is then the composer who usually but unfairly receives the critic's blame for a scene poorly executed.

One wonders if some of the objections to music in films is that it is too effective. We tend to react to music whether we desire to or not and if we don't wish to be moved by it, we resent its presence for making us begin to lose control of our rational, "sophisticated" defenses.

Of course, there are times in a film, perhaps even entire films, when any kind of music is inappropriate. One critic, writing about the film Sunset Boulevard, said: "The plain fact is that the script of Sunset Boulevard with its use of both narration and dialogue, and its realization through the camera, is so complete as to leave music not much to do." This certainly can be the case, but it is not true of most films. Films usually lack music because a producer or director did not want it. To them, music impinges on a sense of "realism." "Where's the music coming from?" is the oft-quoted question. This question was raised during Hitchcock's filming of Lifeboat. On hearing that Hitchcock had asked, "But where is the music supposed to come from out in the middle of the ocean?" composer David Raksin replied: "Ask Mr. Hitchcock where the cameras come from."* The answer, unfortunately for the film composer, demonstrates more intelligence and perception than the question. The film composer must understand more about every other aspect of the filmmaker's craft than any other individual involved in the production. Since the composer is usually called in on the project after the film is complete, he must know what the director, cinematographer, actors, and editor are all trying to say dramatically. Without this dramatic sense for film, the composer is lost and his contribution to the film will be negligible.

[* In my research I have seen this famous reply attributed respectively to David Raksin, a sound technician, Lionel Barrymore and someone in the studio music department. Some checking with those present at the time, however, proved beyond any doubt that it was Raksin who came up with this famous comment.]

A famous example of what purports to be a totally fused relationship of music and picture is the "audiovisual score" constructed by Sergei Eisenstein of a sequence from Alexancler Nevsky. Because this example is used frequently in filn classes and because the assumption that it is a totally fused relationship of music and picture is wholly incorrect, a critique of its essential points are in order.

Figure 6 shows that Eisenstein has constructed a diagram of the "picture rhythm" as well as the "musical movement," for he considers the two to be identical. "Now let us collate the two graphs," he writes in his book The Film Sense, "What do we find? Both graphs of movement correspond absolutely, that is, we find a complete correspondence between the movement of the music and the movement of the eye over the lines of the plastic composition. In other words, exactly the same motion lies at the base of both the musical and the plastic structures."

Two areas in this "correspondence" between picture and music are highly questionable. The first is the relationship of the rhythm of the music to the rhythm of the picture. The identification of musical and visual rhythms is dubious because in the plastic arts the concept of rhythm is largely metaphorical. Here the problem for Eisenstein is compounded, as his graphs refer to single shots, not to the thne relation between them.

The second area in which Eisenstein's views are questionable deals with the idea that the graphs are supposed to prove that the actual movement of the music is similar to the sequence of pictures. In reality, what the graph proves is that there is a similarity between the notation of the music and the picture sequence. This is an extremely important and crucial distinction upon which the whole of Eisenstein's premise rests. But Eisenstein's comparison is a bogus one, for musical notation is merely a graphic fixation of actual musical movement, "the static image of a dynamic phenomenon," according to Hanns Eisler. Music is an art that moves through time, an art that cannot be perceived instantaneously; whereas, in Eisenstein's graph, the pictures are perceived instantly. And while it is possible for the film director, through the composition of his shot, to control somewhat the direction of the viewer's eye movement across the frame, there is no way to control the rhythm or pace of that movement. In shot IV in the diagram, two flags are visible on the horizon. Eisenstein correlates these two flags to two eighth notes in the music. Bccause these two flags are vertical images and in direct conflict with the primary horizontal composition of the shot, they are recognized instantly by the eye. The music, however, is quite another matter. Using Prokofiev's tempo marking of Largo [qtr. note] = 48, it takes approximately 4 seconds from the time shot IV appears on the screen to the appearance of the first specified eighth note on the sound track. It is another 2 1/2 seconds before the second eighth note is heard. The point is that the recognition of the metaphorical picture rhythm of shot IV is instantaneous, while the musical rhythm that Eisenstein claims corresponds to the picture rhythm takes 6 1/2 seconds to be perceived.

Another example of this sort of faulty comparison can be seen in Shot V. The music supposedly imitates the steeply sloping rocks by descending down a triad. The descent down the triad in the music actually has the appearance of a precipitously falling curve in the notation. But the problem here is that in the music itself the fall occurs in time, while the steeply sloping rock in Shot V is seen as unchanged from the first note to the last.

A further objection has to do with the development of the sequence and the music. If we are to accept Eisenstein's thesis of a correspondence between the music and the picture, then we can assume that the musical development will match that of the motion picture. The music then should show some distinction between the close-up and the panoramic views of the film.

However, a close examination of both music and picture will reveal that just the opposite is true, for here the picture moves on while the music merely marks time. For instance, there is a clear difference in the stage of development between the first three shots, which show a good amount of detail, and shot IV, which is a general view of the battle line. But an examination of the music will show that measures 5 through 8 literally repeat measures 1 through 4. In this instance Eisenstein's repeated suggestion that picture and music should correspond in movement goes unnoticed. Alluding again to shot IV, the two eighth notes representing the flags also are heard in the music accompanying shot 11, which does not show any flags. If Eisenstein wishes to be so pedantic in translating picture details into music, he should at least make the pedantry consistent. Instead, Eisenstein seems to practice such pedantry one moment and then forgets it in the next.

What Prokofiev seems to be doing with the music at this point is catching the general tension of this pre-battle moment. In other words, the music is speaking to the psychology of the moment (i.e., apprehension, fear) in terms of the characters involved rather than to any abstract notion of shot development or metaphorical "picture rhythm."

Film theoreticians refuse to give up their idea that this example represents the ultimate wedding of music and picture. For example, John Howard Lawson in his book, Film: The Creative Process, decries the fact that "the experimental work initiated by Eisenstein and Prokofiev in Alexander Nevsky has not been appreciated in theory or utilized in practice." This support of Eisenstein's concept of an "audiovisual score" on the part of film theoreticians is a result of their highly limited and superficial knowledge and understanding of music.